open-do.org rapport :   Visitez le site

Données techniques du open-do.org

Geo IP vous fournit comme la latitude, la longitude et l'ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Notre service GeoIP a trouvé l'hôte open-do.org.Actuellement, hébergé dans France et son fournisseur de services est Adacore SAS .

the related websites

domaine	Titre
open-do.org	open-do | toward a cooperative and open framework for the development of certifi
inno3.fr	accueil | drupal | inno³ | open innovation, open source et open data |
quebecopen.com	québec open 2018- championnat international de karaté québec open | québec open
open-dsi.fr	open-dsi - logiciels libres - open source - lyon - votre expert en solutions lib
open-elearning.com	solutions libres et open source pour l'e-learning | open-elearning
empoweringopeninnovation.org	blog officiel du paris open source summit 2016 – empowering open innovation
open-prod.com	open-prod: erp open source pour la gestion industrielle
open-du-web.fr	Open du Web Le blog du concours-événement Open du Web
objectif-pi.com	open-prod: erp open source pour l’industrie
opensourcebridge.org	open source bridge: the conference for open source citizens / june 29, 2018 / po
ckr-solutions.com	ckr solutions open source | l’expertise open source en provence-alpes-côte d’azu
open-management.fr	open management immobilier | open management est une société de conseil indépend
open-source-guide.com	guide open source : le référentiel des solutions open source professionnelles
opensourcecms.com	open-source scripts list & software directory » open source cms
open-sources.com	open-sources.com::le site des utilisateurs de logiciels open sources en entrepri

legrenierdumoulin.pagesperso-orange.fr freestyle-fishing.com holiday-marina.com camping-lesousbois-oleron.com kerlaz.com immovision.com bellevue-camping.com campinglesdinosaures.com camping-de-lill.net tickets.rolandgarros.com ffgolf.org 

Analyse d'en-tête HTTP

Les informations d'en-tête HTTP font partie du protocole HTTP que le navigateur d'un utilisateur envoie à appelé Apache/2.2.21 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.21 OpenSSL/0.9.8zd-freebsd DAV/2 mod_wsgi/2.8 Python/2.7.10 PHP/5.4.33 contenant les détails de ce que le navigateur veut et acceptera de nouveau du serveur Web.

DNS

HtmlToText

open-do toward a cooperative and open framework for the development of certifiable software skip to content about open-do airborne software certification explained how to participate projects ip 217 – an information model for requirements and design opendo project – rationale ip217 foundations and principles ip217 definition of requirement ip217 definition of design ip217 definition of verification history of ip217 key definitions ip217 information model solutions provided by ip217 do-178b/c core text problems applying ip217 agile couverture geneauto/ada project qualifying machine qmâ - presentation qmâ - design hibersource project hi-lite a database example hi-lite partners hi-lite resources a lighter introduction to hi-lite hi-lite progress hi-lite news and events formal containers socis 2012 project project hi-lite / gnatprove xreq project p open-do conference open-do conference abstracts forge white paper: high-integrity object-oriented programming in ada « older posts dissimilar tools: use cases and impact on tool qualification level by ball | december 3, 2015 frequently, the lack of existing qualifiable cots tools raises the question whether two separately developed and thus dissimilar tools that satisfy the same operational requirements may be used instead of a single tool, either to avoid the need for qualifying that tool or to serve as an alternative method for tool qualification. this question may be answered in different ways by different certification authorities, since no guidance or guidelines are provided in the applicable standards, such as do-178c/ed-12c. do-330/ed-215 identifies the use of dissimilar tools as an example of “alternative method for tool qualification” but without definition of the actual impact of such approach. do we have to understand that the use of non-qualified dissimilar tools replaces the need for qualification of a single tool? is this applicable for all tql? this paper presents several use cases based on the type of tools and certification credit, and examines the possible impact on the need for qualification and the applicable tool qualification level of the use of dissimilar tools. disclaimer: discussion of this topic in the forum for aeronautical software (fas) raised controversial questions and different opinions. therefore, it was difficult to reach a consensus on an information paper. it was decided that this topic is beyond the scope of the fas working group, and the proposal was withdrawn. this document reflects the author’s point of view, based on his background and experience. it should help readers to provide an acceptable rationale for a software life cycle using dissimilar tools in place of a single qualified tool. the author, frã©dã©ric pothon acg solutions, and several of the contributors and reviewers participated in the do-178c/ed-12c working group and subcommittees. download document â© frã©dã©ric pothon, 2015 this work is licensed under a creative commons attribution-noncommercial-sharealike 3.0 unported license . posted in open-do news | leave a comment how to prevent drone crashes using spark by gallet | june 2, 2015 i recently joined adacore as a software engineer intern. the subject of this internship is to rewrite a drone firmware written in c into spark. some of you may be drone addicts and already know the crazyflie, a tiny drone whose first version has been released by bitcraze company in 2013. but for all of those who don’t know anything about this project, or about drones in general, let’s do a brief presentation. the crazyflie is a very small quadcopter sold as an open source development platform: both electronic schematics and source code are directly available on their github and its architecture is very flexible. these two particularities allow the owner to add new features in an easy way. moreover, a wiki and a forum have been made for this purpose, making emerge a little but very enthusiastic crazyflie community! now that we know a little more about the crazyflie, let me do a brief presentation of spark and show you the advantages of using it for drone-related software. even if the crazyflie flies out of the box, it has not been developed with safety in mind: in case of crash, its size, its weight and its plastic propellers won’t hurt anyone! but what if the propellers were made of carbon fiber, and shaped like razor blades to increase the drone’s performance? in theses circumstances, a bug in the flight control system could lead to dramatic events. spark is an ada subset used for high reliability software. spark allows proving absence of runtime errors (overflows, reading of uninitialized variables…) and specification compliance of your program by using functional contracts. the advantages of spark for drone-related software are obvious: by using spark, you can ensure that no runtime errors can occur when the drone is flying. then, if the drone crashes, you can only blame the pilot! after this little overview, let’s see how we can use spark on this kind of code. see more at: http://blog.adacore.com/how-to-prevent-drone-crashes-using-spark posted in open-do news | leave a comment project p open workshop by gallet | may 7, 2015 project-p open workshop model-driven engineeringâ and qualifiable code generator http://www.open-do.org/projects/p/ project p is a three-year research project funded within the french fui 2011 funding framework. it sees the collaboration of major industrial partners (airbus, astrium, continental, rockwell collins, safran, thales), smes (adacore, altair, scilab enterprise, sti), service companies (acg, aboard engineering, atos origins) and research centers (cnrs, enpc, inria, onera). with the project now drawing to an end comes the final presentation of all the work that has been produced over the past 3 years… continental france, project p leader, and all the project partners are pleased to invite you to the presentation of the final results of project p. the event will take place on tuesday 16th june 2015 from 1:30pm to 5:30pm at pã´le systematic – palaiseau, amphitheatre building nâ°3 – nano-innov to find out more about access, please click here: http://www.systematic-paris-region.org/sites/default/files/plan%20nano%20innov2.pdf agenda 1:45pm – 2:00pm: welcome 2:00pm – 4:00pm : presentations introduction to project-p (continental) development and qualification of a generic code generation framework (acgs) qgen: a qualifiable code generator for simulink/stateflow models (adacore) operational use of a code generator (sagem and thales alenia space) overview of other generators used in the project (adacore) a code generator for uml models (atos origin) a formal verification perspective (irit) 4:00pm – 5:30pm : workshop demonstrations model verification and code generation with qgen (adacore) hardware code generation with gaut (labsticc) software code generation for xcos models (scilab enterprise) code generation from nsp language and scicos (inria/altair/enpc) multi-formalism (uml and simulink) code generation (atos/adacore) generated code interoperability and schedulability analysis with syndex (inria) verification of formal requirements for generated code (irit, onera) description of formal requirements for generated code â (irit) registration is mandatory and closes on june 10th 2015 …to do so,â please contact s.minault@systematic-paris-region.org. philippe cuenot continental automotive france tel : 05-61-19-88-88 philippe.cuenot@continental-corporation.com posted in open-do news | leave a comment spark formal by jamie ayre | october 31, 2014 the spark formal project aims to develop a complete set of semantics of the spark language in coq, for: - at the language level, ensuring the absence of ambiguity and the completeness of evaluation rules - at the tool level, ensuring the correct insertion of checks in the ast used for compilation and analysis the formalization of spark also paves the way for the creation of proved toolchains f

Analyse PopURL pour open-do.org

http://www.open-do.org/category/in-the-press/
http://www.open-do.org/projects/hi-lite/news-and-events/
http://www.open-do.org/feed/
http://www.open-do.org/projects/ip-217/do-178bc-core-text-problems/
http://www.open-do.org/projects/qualifying-machine/
http://www.open-do.org/projects/agile/
http://www.open-do.org/projects/
http://www.open-do.org/2014/07/21/parallel-programming-languages-enable-safer-systems/#comments
http://www.open-do.org/2015/12/03/dissimilar-tools-use-cases-and-impact-on-tool-qualification-level/#comments
http://www.open-do.org/projects/ip-217/ip217-foundations-and-principles/ip217-definition-of-verification/
http://www.open-do.org/2014/10/31/spark-formal/#comments
http://www.open-do.org/category/related-initiatives/
http://www.open-do.org/projects/couverture/
http://www.open-do.org/2015/06/02/how-to-prevent-drone-crashes-using-spark/#comments
http://www.open-do.org/category/open-source/
blog.frama-c.com

Informations Whois

Whois est un protocole qui permet d'accéder aux informations d'enregistrement.Vous pouvez atteindre quand le site Web a été enregistré, quand il va expirer, quelles sont les coordonnées du site avec les informations suivantes. En un mot, il comprend ces informations;

WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS open-do.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain
RegrInfo
  REGISTERED unknown

DOMAIN

  NAME open-do.org

NSERVER

  DNS1.GNAT.COM 205.232.38.15

  NS1.EU.ADACORE.COM 194.98.77.54

  NS0.EU.ADACORE.COM 194.98.77.53

  DNS2.GNAT.COM 205.232.38.91

Erreurs

La liste suivante vous montre les fautes d'orthographe possibles des internautes pour le site Web recherché.